Bluearth Forums
September 05, 2010, 05:34:53 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: can lipitor cause blood in urine  (Read 107 times)
johnnyotwa
Guest
« on: May 06, 2010, 08:24:05 AM »

buy cytotec no prescription , cipro and side effects and uti Prednisone , trouble moving leg actoss body cheap proair , long term effects of tramadol 50mg buy zyban no prescriptions , show photos of paxil 40 mg cheap yaz , pravachol zyrtec actos actos veetids
Logged
Tempus Fugit
___In Flux___
Administrator
Ever Spinning
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4119


Perpetual Motion Specialist


WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2010, 05:56:05 PM »

Is this a list of sites you are affiliated with?  Your post has the appearance of spam and an attempt at free advertising with little to no regard for readability.  Personally not a big fan of prescription medications or the medical and pharmaceutical communities for that matter, as they have been corrupted by the desire to make huge profits at the expense of peoples' health and lives.  

For example:
Most Astonishing Health Disaster of the 20th Century

An interesting article that helps underline some of the trouble areas 'we' the people must deal with:  http://www.bostonreview.net/BR35.3/angell.php

Quote
Drug companies support educational programs even within our best medical schools and teaching hospitals, and are given virtually unfettered access to young doctors to ply them with gifts and meals and promote their wares. In most states doctors are required to take accredited education courses, called continuing medical education (CME), and drug companies contribute roughly half the support for this education, often indirectly through private investor-owned medical-education companies whose only clients are drug companies. CME is supposed to be free of drug-company influence, but incredibly these private educators have been accredited to provide CME by the American Medical Association’s Accreditation Committee for Continuing Medical Education—a case of the fox not only guarding the chicken coop, but living inside it.

One of the most flagrant examples of the merging of education and marketing is Pri-Med, which is owned by M/C Communications, one of the largest of the medical-education companies. In partnership with Harvard Medical School, Pri-Med provides CME conferences throughout the country at virtually no cost to those who attend, courtesy of the huge income it receives from industry sponsors. The programs feature industry-prepared symposia during free meals, as well as academic talks by faculty during the rest of the day. The two types of talks are listed separately, but take place at the same meeting, where there is also a gigantic exhibit hall for industry sponsors. The Harvard name and logo figure prominently in Pri-Med’s advertising and at the conferences, in return for which Harvard Medical School receives direct income, as well as payments to participating faculty.

If drug companies and medical educators were really providing education, doctors and academic institutions would pay them for their services. When you take piano lessons, you pay the teacher, not the other way around. But in this case, industry pays the academic institutions and faculty, and even the doctors who take the courses. The companies are simply buying access to medical school faculty and to doctors in training and practice.

This is marketing masquerading as education. It is self-evidently absurd to look to companies for critical, unbiased education about products they sell. It’s like asking a brewery to teach you about alcoholism, or a Honda dealer for a recommendation about what car to buy. Doctors recognize this in other parts of their lives, but they’ve convinced themselves that drug companies are different. That industry-sponsored education is a masquerade is underscored by the fact that some of the biggest Madison Avenue ad agencies, hired by drug companies to promote their products, also own their own medical-education companies. It’s one-stop shopping for the industry.

But doctors do learn something from all the ostensible education they’re paid to receive. Doctors and their patients come to believe that for every ailment and discontent there is a drug, even when changes in lifestyle would be more effective. And they believe that the newest, most expensive brand-name drugs are superior to older drugs or generics, even though there is seldom any evidence to that effect because sponsors don’t usually compare their drugs with older drugs at equivalent doses. In addition, doctors are encouraged to prescribe drugs for uses not approved by the FDA (known as “off-label” prescriptions).


I'm afraid that if your goal is to come here and attempt to make commissions by offering access to 'cheap' meds that in my opinion do more harm than good, you will find that we are beyond disinterested.
Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP The views and opinions expressed by members of these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Bluearth Scooters or its partners.
This website is intended for the free exchange of ideas between those who would choose to use it.

Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!